Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-26 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-26 Senate Journal Page 1769 SB 88 CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) "An Act relating to grants to municipalities, named recipients, and unincorporated communities; establishing capital project matching grant programs for municipalities and unincorporated communities; establishing a local share requirement for capital project grants to municipalities, named recipients, and unincorporated communities; and providing for an effective date" was read the third time. Senator Adams moved that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) return to second reading for rescinding action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 1. The question being: "Shall the bill be returned to second reading for rescinding action?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 88(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date Return to Second for Rescinding Action - AM 1 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the bill failed to return to second reading. Senator Adams moved that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) return to second reading for rescinding action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2. The question being: "Shall the bill be returned to second reading for rescinding action?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-26 Senate Journal Page 1770 SB 88 CSSB 88(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date Return to Second for Rescinding Action - AM 2 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the bill failed to return to second reading. Senator Adams moved that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) return to second reading for rescinding action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 3. The question being: "Shall the bill be returned to second reading for rescinding action?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 88(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date Return to Second for Rescinding Action - AM 3 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the bill failed to return to second reading. 1993-04-26 Senate Journal Page 1771 SB 88 Senator Adams moved and asked unanimous consent that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) be returned to second reading for a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 6. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 88(FIN) Return to Second for Specific Amendment - AM 6 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Phillips, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the bill failed to return to second reading. Senator Lincoln moved and asked unanimous consent that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 7. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 88(FIN) Return to Second for Specific Amendment - AM 7 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff 1993-04-26 Senate Journal Page 1772 SB 88 Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the bill failed to return to second reading. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) "An Act relating to grants to municipalities, named recipients, and unincorporated communities; establishing capital project matching grant programs for municipalities and unincorporated communities; establishing a local share requirement for capital project grants to municipalities, named recipients, and unincorporated communities; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 88(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN) passed the Senate. Senator Taylor moved the effective date clause. Senator Donley objected. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 88(FIN) Effective Date 1993-04-26 Senate Journal Page 1773 SB 88 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, the effective date clause failed. Senator Pearce gave notice of reconsideration. Senator Duncan moved and asked unanimous consent that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN)(efd fld) be taken up the same legislative day. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 88(FIN)(efd fld) be taken up?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 88(FIN) Shall reconsideration be taken up same day? YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Kerttula changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, the motion failed.